Jun 27, 2005

AAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!

SUPREME MY A@@

These people are supposed to be the elite in our legal society and provide direction on legal constitutionality??? - How vague can you be for anti-"GODs'" sake. It's ok for government buildings to display the 10 commandments... but our courtrooms, excluding their own vaulted Supreme Court building it is NOT! What are you guys afraid we might have a judiciary with attacks of conscience?

Its time for them all to retire!

13 comments:

David Bowie said...

NO PA-- IT'S TIME FOR THEM ALL TO BE IMPEACHED!!!! OOOOPPPPPSSS!! THAT MIGHT BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL?????

Dan Colgan said...

No I believe it is actually the remedy provided for in the constitution.

Dan Colgan said...

Somebody needs to bring me Sandra Day O'sleezebucket's head on a platter (figuratively speaking of course)

Either her or David Souter!

David Bowie said...

It is--my sarcastic streak shows up every once in a while--You may have noticed???

Dan Colgan said...

Sorry, I'm so P'O'd right now I could chew nails.

David Bowie said...

No Problem--I totally understand!!

David Bowie said...

Call me stupid--but how can the 10 Commandments be constitutional in one place and unconstitutional in another??

Is this what you call an oxymoron??

Dan Colgan said...

OH I call it moronic alright...

David Bowie said...

What is really going to be interesting is who the President will nominate to replace Rhenquist should he retire. Methinks the so-called "filibuster compromise" is going to go straight down the toliet. (or in the words of Archie Bunker--teerrrlit) SARC!

David Bowie said...

Just saw a USA Today poll, which asked if it should be constitutional to display the 10 Commandments on govermnent property. Surprisingly 58% said YES--So what does this say for the wisdom or lack thereof of our Supreme Court???
FYI: Here's the link to the USA Today article which has the poll.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-06-27-scotus-commandments_x.htm

I would say the numbers speak for themselves!!!

Dan Colgan said...

That's what is so stupid about yesterdays' split decision. ITS OK to display them on government property, JUST NOT AT COURTHOUSES? - Freek'n ludicrous

David Bowie said...

This ruling is going from bad to worse--Talk about a bunch of hypocrites, these ninnys in the Black Robes really have a lot of crust, because in their sense of logic the frieze of Moses holding the 10 Commandments which is inside the Chamber of the Supreme Court is OK, but the framed copies that were in two Kentucky court houses was NOT. LUDICROUS--LUDICROUS DOESN'T EVEN BEGIN TO COVER JUST HOW ABSURD AND STUPID THIS DECISION REALLY IS!!!
Check out--http://news.findlaw.com/ for more information on this issue and other top legal news.

David Bowie said...

BTW- Is anyone working on those impeachment articles???