Jan 11, 2007

SILENCING CONSERVATIVE SPEECH

In all the years that I have been following Federal and State Legislation, I have never seen a more horrific and totalitarian bill as Senate Bill #1 which is currently under consideration by the United States Senate. In essence, if this piece of legislation, if passed, it will effectively silence conservative grassroots organizations such as the Family Research Council, American Family Association, and others, and would prohibit them from notifying their membership of critical issues pending before the Congress, unless Congress is notified 45 days in advance of any alerts being sent out. Does this sound somewhat familiar?? If not allow me to briefly explain. When Lyndon Johnson was running for the U.S, Senate in the 1950's conservative and religious leaders severely criticized Johnson for his "questionable" lifestyle. While this caused Johnson some difficulty during his campaign, he was ultimately elected to the Senate from the State of Texas. Obviously angered by these attacks, Johnson's first task as a "new" Senator was to exact a little payback for the audacity of these religious leaders for attacking his character, so he added a "rider" to an Appropriations Bill that prohibited conservative organizations from speaking out against a candidates private life or other moral issues 60 days before any election cycle.

This is not only outrageous it clearly violates every citizens First Amendment right to free speech and expression, not to mention running afoul of one's freedom of religion.

The articles below represent a clear and present danger to everything that we hold dear and sacred as Christians and Conservatives, and it is imperitive that Senate Bill #1must be defeated or at the very least amended to remove the prohibition on "grassroots" lobbying. Please contact your U.S. Senators and urge them to vote against Senate Bill #1. The very core of our freedoms and liberties are at stake!

From Focus on the Family


Jan. 10, 2007

Dr. Dobson Urges You to Stop Bill
That Would Limit Free Speech

Send a fax demanding the U.S. Senate reject an oppressive attempt to silence groups like ours.

Focus on the Family Action Chairman Dr. James Dobson is urging you to fight a grave threat to your First Amendment rights being considered by the U.S. Senate. And we've made it easy for you to do your part by creating a ready-to-send fax you can route directly to your two senators with just a few clicks of your mouse.

At issue is S. 1 -- the first bill the newly Democratic Senate will consider next week. While much of the bill, which aims to clean up recent lobbying scandals, is good, it contains a provision that would severely limit the ability of Americans like you to stay abreast of important issues being discussed and voted on in Washington.

It also would subject groups like Focus on the Family Action to miles of red tape that could critically hamper our ability to rally concerned Americans like you to make your voices heard by your elected officials. We could even face $100,000 fines for running afoul of the oppressive regulations.

"Clearly, the objective here is to hide what goes on from the public," Dr. Dobson says on today's edition of his daily radio broadcast. "And to punish and silence those of us who would talk about what the Congress is doing."

http://listen.family.org/daily/A000000188.cfm


From the Washington Examiner

Commentary

Mark Tapscott: Pelosi preparing new shackles for free speech
Mark Tapscott, The Examiner
Dec 19, 2006 3:00 AM (22 days ago)
Current rank: # 636 of 12,254 articles

WASHINGTON - Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has cooked up with Public Citizen's Joan Claybrook a "lobbying reform" that actually protects rich special interests and activists millionaires while clamping new shackles on citizens' First Amendment rights to petition Congress and speak their minds.


Pelosi tried earlier this year to move H.R. 4682, the "Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006," which is now cited by Public Citizen's Web site as the vehicle it is helping the incoming speaker to craft for the new Congress. The proposal Claybrook is helping craft for introduction early in 2007 is expected to be essentially the same bill Pelosi put forth this year.

That is bad news for the First Amendment and for preserving the kind of healthy, open debate that is essential to holding politicians, bureaucrats and special interests to account for their conduct of the public business.

The key provision of the 2006 bill was its redefinition of grassroots lobbying to include small citizens groups whose messages about Congress and public policy issues are directed toward the general public, according to attorneys for the Free Speech Coalition.

All informational and educational materials produced by such groups would have to be registered and reported on a quarterly basis. Failure to report would result in severe civil penalties (likely followed soon by criminal penalties as well).

In addition, the 2006 bill created a new statutory category of First Amendment activity to be regulated by Congress. Known as "grassroots lobbying firms," these groups would be required to register with Congress and be subject to penalties whenever they are paid $50,000 or more to communicate with the general public during any three-month period.

In other words, for the first time in American history, potentially millions of concerned citizens involved in grassroots lobbying and representing viewpoints from across the entire political spectrum would have to register with Congress in order to exercise their First Amendment rights.

There is even more bad news here, though, because the Pelosi-Claybrook proposal includes loopholes big enough to protect Big Labor, Big Corporations and Big Nonprofits, as well as guys with Big Wallets like George Soros. Big Government, you see, always takes care of its big friends.

The Pelosi-Claybrook proposal builds on the restrictions on free speech created by campaign finance reform measures like McCain-Feingold that bar criticism of congressional incumbents for 30 days prior to a primary and 60 days before a general election.

What we are witnessing here is the continuing repeal of the First Amendment. If Pelosi-Claybrook becomes law in 2007, you can be sure it will be followed by more regulations and restrictions on free speech in 2008 and beyond.

The next steps after forcing grassroots citizen lobbyists to register with Congress will be the steady encroachment of congressional inquisitors into determining whose messages are fit for the public and whose are not. Any guesses on what the officially approved messages will say about things like waste and corruption in government?

Nothing. The inquisitors won't allow it.

That's what Big Government does — it keeps getting bigger and bigger and, as Publius noted in The Federalist Papers, no "parchment barrier" like the First Amendment is going to prevent those in power from telling the rest of us how to live.

That's the lesson forgotten by the Republicans who were given the opportunity of a dozen years to start putting Big Government back in its place and thereby protect individual freedom.

So now we have Nancy Pelosi and Joan Claybrook deciding what kind of grassroots lobbying the rest of us can do.

Washington Examiner editorial page editor Mark Tapscott's blog is at www.examiner.com/blogs/tapscotts_copy_desk

http://www.examiner.com/a-464413%7EMark_Tapscott__Pelosi_preparing_new_shackles_for_free_speech.html

No comments: